id,title,description,date_created,date_modified,date_published,original_publication_date,publication_doi,provider,is_published,reviews_state,version,is_latest_version,preprint_doi,license,tags_list,tags_data,contributors_list,contributors_data,first_author,subjects_list,subjects_data,download_url,has_coi,conflict_of_interest_statement,has_data_links,has_prereg_links,prereg_links,prereg_link_info,last_updated
n7mfh_v1,Beyond Black Boxes and Biases: Advancing Artificial Intelligence in Sentencing,"Abstract: This study explores the potential integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the Indonesian legal system to enhance the consistency of sentencing in the context of corruption offences. We examine the role of AI as a judicial assistant within the framework of the Indonesian Supreme Court's 2020 Sentencing Guidelines for the Law on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. We argue that the structured nature of the corruption sentencing guidelines—which include a stepwise approach and the ternary categorisation of sentencing factors—presents a unique opportunity to address the many criticisms and challenges concerning the use of AI in sentencing. Specifically, we suggest that AI could be a valuable tool for assisting judges in delivering more consistent sentences for corruption offences. Our objective is not to advocate for the immediate adoption of AI but to stimulate discussion on novel strategies for the application of AI in sentencing.",2025-03-15T02:47:47.198046,2025-03-25T04:16:42.509219,2025-03-24T20:06:33.306429,,,lawarchive,1,accepted,1,1,https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/n7mfh_v1,CC-By Attribution 4.0 International,Artificial Intelligence; Criminal Law; Law and Technology; Machine Learning; Sentencing; Sentencing consistency,"[""Artificial Intelligence"", ""Criminal Law"", ""Law and Technology"", ""Machine Learning"", ""Sentencing"", ""Sentencing consistency""]",Armin Alimardani,"[{""id"": ""8a3rq"", ""name"": ""Armin Alimardani"", ""index"": 0, ""orcid"": ""0000-0002-5580-4239"", ""bibliographic"": true}]",Armin Alimardani,Law; Science and Technology Law; Criminal Law,"[{""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225a"", ""text"": ""Law""}, {""id"": ""65047475c666880012ba25b9"", ""text"": ""Science and Technology Law""}, {""id"": ""65047475c666880012ba25be"", ""text"": ""Criminal Law""}]",https://osf.io/download/67d4ea6ce90267294da72689,0,,,,null,,2025-04-09T21:06:20.362363
mkat7_v1,Borderline Disaster: An Empirical Study on Student Usage of GenAI in a Law Assignment,"This empirical study examines the outcomes of integrating Generative AI (GenAI) into a law assignment. Despite receiving instruction on the importance of verifying GenAI outputs and feedback on their attempts to use these tools effectively, a notable portion of students included fabricated or inaccurate information that had been generated by AI in their assignments. This overreliance on AI outputs suggests that instruction and guided practice alone may not sufficiently mitigate the risks associated with the inappropriate use of GenAI. A particularly concerning issue is the difficulty of identifying AI-generated inaccuracies in assessment tasks, which often requires considerable time and effort. Consequently, such errors may go unnoticed, potentially allowing students to bypass the development of essential skills, such as critical thinking, analytical reasoning, and the ability to independently evaluate information. Addressing overreliance on GenAI will require developing robust strategies that should be implemented for the entire duration of a student’s university degree to ensure they engage with AI tools effectively and responsibly.",2025-03-15T02:29:07.790917,2025-03-25T04:09:45.379338,2025-03-24T19:59:22.857039,,,lawarchive,1,accepted,1,1,https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/mkat7_v1,No license,Artificial Intelligence; ChatGPT; Critical Thinking; GenAI; Generative AI; Higher Education; Law; Verification Drift,"[""Artificial Intelligence"", ""ChatGPT"", ""Critical Thinking"", ""GenAI"", ""Generative AI"", ""Higher Education"", ""Law"", ""Verification Drift""]",Armin Alimardani,"[{""id"": ""8a3rq"", ""name"": ""Armin Alimardani"", ""index"": 0, ""orcid"": ""0000-0002-5580-4239"", ""bibliographic"": true}]",Armin Alimardani,Law; Education; Medicine and Health Sciences; Higher Education; Science and Technology Law,"[{""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225a"", ""text"": ""Law""}, {""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225c"", ""text"": ""Education""}, {""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225e"", ""text"": ""Medicine and Health Sciences""}, {""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba2264"", ""text"": ""Higher Education""}, {""id"": ""65047475c666880012ba25b9"", ""text"": ""Science and Technology Law""}]",https://osf.io/download/67d4e6215f20c146d55aed79,0,,,,null,,2025-04-09T21:06:16.678567
kfbs9_v1,Fair or Unfair Differentiation? Reconsidering the Concept of Equality for the Regulation of Algorithmically Guided Decision-Making.,"Algorithms are increasingly relied upon to help decision-makers automate, streamline, structure and guide a variety of decision-making processes, ranging from trivial to critical, in both the public and private sector. This dissertation is concerned with a specific type of injustice that may come along with the development and deployment of algorithmically guided decision-making systems: the emergence of unjust (in)equality brought about by various instances of differentiation and differential treatment that take place within and as part of these systems. 

In this data-driven environment, people and groups of people are continuously classified, categorised, ranked and scored on a variety of features or attributes, such as their characteristics, interests, behaviour and preferences. For decision-subjects, these differentiation acts can generate significant consequences regarding their social position and life’s prospects: they affect the choices and options they are presented, the interactions and relationships they hold with others and themselves, the opportunities they are given, the burdens and benefits they carry, and so forth. Yet, when applied on a large enough scale, these decisions may also initiate significant societal change. 

Due to the complexity of the digital environment and the distinctive characteristics algorithmically guided decisions exhibit, it has become increasingly difficult to assess whether the decisions these knowledge and data-driven systems inform, and the (in)equalities they produce, can be justified. As a consequence, uncertainty exists as to whether current and future regulatory efforts, and the approach to equality they (will) adhere to, have the capacity to respond to the egalitarian harms algorithms risk to introduce in an appropriate manner.

In this dissertation, I reposition and operationalise the notion of equality as a practicable and interpretative lens to strengthen the evaluation and regulation of algorithmically guided decision-making practices in light of the inequalities they (risk to) produce. 

This dissertation begins with a definition of the algorithmic research context in which the notion of equality will be operationalised. I explore a series of characteristics that typify algorithmic systems and render the inequalities they generate distinctive in terms of their form and scope. Due to these unique characteristics, algorithmic inequalities have the potential to restructure the fabric of society alongside new and existing dimensions: they may not only reinforce existing social injustice, but they may also introduce new forms of non-representational injustice (Chapter 1).
 
Drawing inspiration from both European equality and non-discrimination law and political philosophical theories of justice, and informed by the (practical) functioning of algorithmic decision-making systems and the particular challenges these bring along, I propose equality as a multidimensional concept that can be specified alongside three (interrelated) axes. 

The model represents a core set of ideals commonly associated with the notion of equality as a social value: equal concern and respect (the moral dimension), equal social standing and equal social relationships (the socio-relational dimension), and/or equal access to certain justice-relevant goods (the distributive dimension) (Chapter 2). Throughout this dissertation, this multidimensional understanding of equality is operationalised to identify, articulate and evaluate algorithmic injustice, and the response formulated thereto within a given policy, law, code or theory. 

In a first step, my understanding of equality is positioned against the algorithmic environment in order to articulate and identify the egalitarian harms algorithms risk to impose onto decision-subjects and society at large (Part I: Identification, Chapter 2). 

In a second step, the multidimensional model functions as a support mechanism to uncover and evaluate the legal conceptualisation of equality found within European equality and non-discrimination law (Council of Europe and European Union). By investigating whom the law protects (equality of whom?) against which inequalities (what egalitarian ideals do they promote?) and how (what review mechanisms have been put in place when equality is positioned against competing values?), I assess whether the legal approach to equality can address the injustice algorithms risk to introduce (Part II: Evaluation; Chapters 3-5).  

In a third step, I rely upon the model to locate and examine specific notions of equality – chosen due to their correspondence with the aforementioned dimensions. These socio-relational (domination and oppression) and distributive (primary goods and capabilities) notions are examined to concretise the egalitarian harms algorithms risk to produce, the conditions under which these harms may manifest in practice, and the safeguards that can be provided to protect decision-subjects and society at large against them (Part III: Navigation; Chapter 6 and 7). 

Finally, based upon my findings, I formulate a set of normative recommendations aimed at repositioning the concept of equality within the algorithmic governance debate in an effort to strengthen its guiding function for the evaluation and regulation of algorithmically informed decision-making systems (Part IV: Synthesis; Chapter 8).",2025-02-26T16:39:15.292156,2025-02-26T21:51:25.379586,2025-02-26T21:49:50.180601,2023-01-22T23:00:00,,lawarchive,1,accepted,1,1,https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/kfbs9_v1,No license,AI; Algorithms; Artificial Intelligence; Automated Decision-Making; Automated Decision-making; Equality; Fair Machine Learning; Fairness; Fundamental Rights; Machine Learning; Non-discrimination; Political Philosophy; Social Justice; Unfair Differentiation,"[""AI"", ""Algorithms"", ""Artificial Intelligence"", ""Automated Decision-Making"", ""Automated Decision-making"", ""Equality"", ""Fair Machine Learning"", ""Fairness"", ""Fundamental Rights"", ""Machine Learning"", ""Non-discrimination"", ""Political Philosophy"", ""Social Justice"", ""Unfair Differentiation""]",Laurens Naudts,"[{""id"": ""pe62k"", ""name"": ""Laurens Naudts"", ""index"": 0, ""orcid"": ""0000-0002-5777-1450"", ""bibliographic"": true}]",Laurens Naudts,Law; Social and Behavioral Sciences,"[{""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225a"", ""text"": ""Law""}, {""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225b"", ""text"": ""Social and Behavioral Sciences""}]",https://osf.io/download/67bf43c46208f9486dbd5d15,0,,,,null,,2025-04-09T21:06:19.028944
724h6_v1,The States as a Laboratory: Legal Innovation and State Competition for Corporate Charters,"Corporate law is an arena in which the metaphor of the ""states as a laboratory"" describes actual practice, and, for the most part, this is a laboratory that has worked reasonably well. The goal of this Article is to map out over time the diffusion of corporate law reforms across the states. The lawmaking pattern we observe indicates a dynamic process in which legal innovations originate from several sources, creating a period of legal experimentation that tends to identify a statutory formulation that is thereafter adopted by the vast majority of states. Delaware and the Model Act quite often work in tandem. But there are occasions when they advance differing legal rules, accounting for some of the diversity in corporation codes that we observe.",2025-02-22T18:03:31.673216,2025-02-24T20:23:15.242346,2025-02-24T20:21:56.419802,,,lawarchive,1,accepted,1,1,https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/724h6_v1,,,[],Roberta Romano,"[{""id"": ""k7bwx"", ""name"": ""Roberta Romano"", ""index"": 0, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": true}, {""id"": ""wmqsk"", ""name"": ""Hajyahia, Alaa"", ""index"": 1, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": false}, {""id"": ""jg5c2"", ""name"": ""Nor Ortiz"", ""index"": 2, ""orcid"": ""0000-0002-6928-3358"", ""bibliographic"": false}]",Roberta Romano,Law; Business Organizations Law; Law and Economics; Legislation,"[{""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225a"", ""text"": ""Law""}, {""id"": ""65047465c666880012ba22eb"", ""text"": ""Business Organizations Law""}, {""id"": ""65047467c666880012ba234e"", ""text"": ""Law and Economics""}, {""id"": ""6504746ac666880012ba23c6"", ""text"": ""Legislation""}]",https://osf.io/download/67ba117e1bf4e35d23c35906,0,,,,null,,2025-04-09T21:06:17.618155
qjsf9_v1,Does the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Have a Future?,"Although the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) received nearly unanimous congressional support, only a few years thereafter its wisdom was increasingly questioned and its supporters had to stave off attempts to recraft the legislation. The financial crisis of 2008 has sidelined efforts to alter the legislation's most costly provision, as Congress's attention has turned to overhauling the regulatory regime for financial institutions. There is, nonetheless, much to be learned about financial regulation and SOX's future, from an in-depth examination of the interplay of the government and private commissions created with an eye to revising the legislation, media coverage of those entities, and congressional responses.",2025-02-22T17:58:56.603423,2025-02-24T15:25:06.891595,2025-02-24T15:22:31.670070,,,lawarchive,1,accepted,1,1,https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/qjsf9_v1,,,[],Roberta Romano,"[{""id"": ""k7bwx"", ""name"": ""Roberta Romano"", ""index"": 0, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": true}, {""id"": ""wmqsk"", ""name"": ""Hajyahia, Alaa"", ""index"": 1, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": false}, {""id"": ""jg5c2"", ""name"": ""Nor Ortiz"", ""index"": 2, ""orcid"": ""0000-0002-6928-3358"", ""bibliographic"": false}]",Roberta Romano,Law; Banking and Finance Law; Administrative Law; Securities Law,"[{""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225a"", ""text"": ""Law""}, {""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba226e"", ""text"": ""Banking and Finance Law""}, {""id"": ""65047465c666880012ba2304"", ""text"": ""Administrative Law""}, {""id"": ""6504746ac666880012ba23d1"", ""text"": ""Securities Law""}]",https://osf.io/download/67ba1072e62a3222dc314124,0,,,,null,,2025-04-09T21:06:14.848688
x6ft7_v1,For Diversity in the International Regulation of Financial Institutions: Critiquing and Recalibrating the Basel Architecture,"This Article challenges the prevailing view of the efficacy of harmonized international financial regulation and provides a mechanism for facilitating regulatory diversity and experimentation within the existing global regulatory framework, the Basel Accords. Recent experience suggests that regulatory harmonization can increase, rather than decrease, systemic risk, an effect that is the precise opposite of the objective of harmonization. By incentivizing financial institutions worldwide to follow broadly similar business strategies, regulatory error contributed to a global financial crisis. Furthermore, the dynamic nature of financial markets renders it improbable that regulators will be able to predict with confidence what are the optimal capital requirements or what other regulatory policies would reduce systemic risk. Nor, as past experience suggests, is it likely that regulators will be able to predict which future financial innovations, activities or institutions might generate systemic risk. The Article contends, accordingly, that there would be value added from increasing the flexibility of the international financial regulatory architecture as a means of reducing systemic risk. It proposes making the Basel architecture more adaptable by creating a procedural mechanism to allow for departures along multiple dimensions from Basel while providing safeguards, given the limited knowledge that we do possess, against the ratcheting up of systemic risk from such departures. The core of the mechanism to introduce diversity into Basel is a peer review of proposed departures from Basel, and, upon approval of such departures, ongoing monitoring for their impact on global systemic risk. If a departure were found to increase systemic risk, it would be disallowed. Such a diversity mechanism would improve the quality of regulatory decision-making by generating information on which regulations work best under which circumstances. It would also reduce the threat to financial stability posed by regulatory errors that increase systemic risk by reducing the likelihood that international banks worldwide will follow broadly similar, mistaken strategies in response to regulatory incentives.",2025-02-22T17:53:57.309231,2025-02-24T15:26:42.470135,2025-02-24T15:23:26.736624,,,lawarchive,1,accepted,1,1,https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/x6ft7_v1,,,[],Roberta Romano,"[{""id"": ""k7bwx"", ""name"": ""Roberta Romano"", ""index"": 0, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": true}, {""id"": ""wmqsk"", ""name"": ""Hajyahia, Alaa"", ""index"": 1, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": false}, {""id"": ""jg5c2"", ""name"": ""Nor Ortiz"", ""index"": 2, ""orcid"": ""0000-0002-6928-3358"", ""bibliographic"": false}]",Roberta Romano,Law; Banking and Finance Law; Administrative Law; International Law,"[{""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225a"", ""text"": ""Law""}, {""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba226e"", ""text"": ""Banking and Finance Law""}, {""id"": ""65047465c666880012ba2304"", ""text"": ""Administrative Law""}, {""id"": ""65047475c666880012ba25bb"", ""text"": ""International Law""}]",https://osf.io/download/67ba0f569bf3c6cbbb0c7c48,0,,,,null,,2025-04-09T21:06:23.646159
r3vtp_v1,Regulating in the Dark and a Postscript Assessment of the Iron Law of Financial Regulation,"How should one regulate in the midst of a financial crisis? This is a fundamental question for financial regulation, and it is not readily answerable, as the issues implicated are truly complex, if not intractable. Yet, foundational financial legislation tends to be enacted in a crisis setting, and over the past decade, when confronted with this question, the U.S. Congress has answered it reflexively by enacting legislation massively increasing the scope and scale of the regulation of business firms, and, especially, financial institutions and instruments, in a manner seemingly oblivious to the cost and consequences of its actions, A simple, but telling, comparison of a commonly used measure of legislative complexity, a statute's published length, conveys what Congress has wrought. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (""Sarbanes- Oxley"" or ""Sarbanes-Oxley Act"") is 66 pages long and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (""Dodd-Frank"" or ""Dodd-Frank Act"") is an astounding 848 pages, whereas the twentieth century foundational federal banking legislation, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the Banking Act of 1933 (""Glass-Steagall Act""), are 31 and 37 pages, respectively.",2025-02-22T17:49:19.014096,2025-02-24T15:27:25.957043,2025-02-24T15:24:25.949436,,,lawarchive,1,accepted,1,1,https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/r3vtp_v1,,,[],Roberta Romano,"[{""id"": ""k7bwx"", ""name"": ""Roberta Romano"", ""index"": 0, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": true}, {""id"": ""wmqsk"", ""name"": ""Hajyahia, Alaa"", ""index"": 1, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": false}, {""id"": ""jg5c2"", ""name"": ""Nor Ortiz"", ""index"": 2, ""orcid"": ""0000-0002-6928-3358"", ""bibliographic"": false}]",Roberta Romano,Law; Banking and Finance Law; Administrative Law; Securities Law,"[{""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225a"", ""text"": ""Law""}, {""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba226e"", ""text"": ""Banking and Finance Law""}, {""id"": ""65047465c666880012ba2304"", ""text"": ""Administrative Law""}, {""id"": ""6504746ac666880012ba23d1"", ""text"": ""Securities Law""}]",https://osf.io/download/67ba0e2603db0d418da54f8d,0,,,,null,,2025-04-09T21:06:13.041269
s3b7w_v1,Remembering Marvin Chirelstein,"It is a privilege for me to contribute to this volume remembering Marvin Chirelstein, for he changed the course of my life. I knew Marvin best as my teacher, and that perspective informs my remarks. To put it most directly, I would not be doing what I have been doing for the past thirty-plus years, if I had not taken Marvin's courses. I would also venture to say that this is true of innumerable lawyers and law teachers who were his students.",2025-02-22T17:39:48.288177,2025-02-24T15:27:42.079122,2025-02-24T15:25:17.190911,2016-01-01T05:00:00,,lawarchive,1,accepted,1,1,https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/s3b7w_v1,CC-By Attribution 4.0 International,Corporate Finance; Legal Education; Teaching Methods; Yale Law School,"[""Corporate Finance"", ""Legal Education"", ""Teaching Methods"", ""Yale Law School""]",Roberta Romano,"[{""id"": ""k7bwx"", ""name"": ""Roberta Romano"", ""index"": 0, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": true}, {""id"": ""wmqsk"", ""name"": ""Hajyahia, Alaa"", ""index"": 1, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": false}, {""id"": ""jg5c2"", ""name"": ""Nor Ortiz"", ""index"": 2, ""orcid"": ""0000-0002-6928-3358"", ""bibliographic"": false}]",Roberta Romano,Law; Legal Writing and Research; Business Organizations Law; Tax Law; Legal Profession,"[{""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225a"", ""text"": ""Law""}, {""id"": ""65047464c666880012ba22d6"", ""text"": ""Legal Writing and Research""}, {""id"": ""65047465c666880012ba22eb"", ""text"": ""Business Organizations Law""}, {""id"": ""65047465c666880012ba22f0"", ""text"": ""Tax Law""}, {""id"": ""6504746ac666880012ba23e8"", ""text"": ""Legal Profession""}]",https://osf.io/download/67ba0bee9bf3c6cbbb0c79e8,0,,,,null,,2025-04-09T21:06:23.940542
yajsf_v1,"A2J/A2K: Access to Justice, Access to Knowledge, and Economic Inequalities in Open Courts and Arbitrations","The topic of this symposium, Secrecy, suggests a focus on affirmative decisions shutting out the public by sealing records and closing courtrooms. My interest, in contrast, is in a broader set of processes that makes dispute resolution inaccessible and, in that sense, secret. My focus is on the problem of institutional privatization, as contrasted with questions of individuals' personal privacy. The kind of secrecy I discuss here has several sources including the promotion of alternative dispute resolution (""ADR"") through in-chambers judicial management and settlement efforts; the design of some online dispute resolution (""ODR"") and court-annexed arbitration programs; mandates to outsource dispute resolution to private providers; bans on pursuing relief through class actions; and the costs to individuals of pursuing claims.",2025-02-22T17:32:42.761238,2025-02-24T20:38:23.450447,2025-02-24T20:37:18.875295,,,lawarchive,1,accepted,1,1,https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/yajsf_v1,,,[],Judith Resnik,"[{""id"": ""s9tx7"", ""name"": ""Judith Resnik"", ""index"": 0, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": true}, {""id"": ""wmqsk"", ""name"": ""Hajyahia, Alaa"", ""index"": 1, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": false}, {""id"": ""jg5c2"", ""name"": ""Nor Ortiz"", ""index"": 2, ""orcid"": ""0000-0002-6928-3358"", ""bibliographic"": false}]",Judith Resnik,Law; Civil Procedure,"[{""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225a"", ""text"": ""Law""}, {""id"": ""6504746ac666880012ba23e0"", ""text"": ""Civil Procedure""}]",https://osf.io/download/67ba0a4240a1760f720c770d,0,,,,null,,2025-04-09T21:06:13.494704
g4qxb_v1,"Partial ""Global Peace"": Federalism and the Long Tail of Remedies in Opiod Litigation","The Opioid Litigation yields important insights for federalism and for remedies in complex multi-party and multi-prong cases. This sprawling set of cases underscores that essentialized ideas of a set of fixed ""state"" and ""federal"" interests do not capture the diverse and often conflicting goals of states and subunits or of the national government. Likewise, this litigation serves as a reminder of the need to reframe assumptions about the role courts ought to play when considering settlements aiming ""for global peace."" Large-scale litigation is often thought to be a two-step process entailing a first decision to aggregate and a second step of either a trial or a settlement. But these forms of lawsuits do not end there. Law needs to clarify that a third step is needed because, even when interests are sufficiently homogenous to warrant aggregation at a litigation's inception and conclusion, differences can emerge thereafter when implementing remedies. Judges should use their authority to ensure that aggregated plaintiffs continue to have access to courts during all three phases of large-scale litigation. Recognition is needed that resolutions are partial because, after liability issues have been resolved, additional information often emerges about the individuals and entities to whom remedies are supposed to flow, and readjustments may be needed in the structure and allocation of relief.",2025-02-22T17:27:01.359660,2025-02-24T20:55:09.657214,2025-02-24T20:54:01.586530,,,lawarchive,1,accepted,1,1,https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/g4qxb_v1,,,[],Judith Resnik,"[{""id"": ""s9tx7"", ""name"": ""Judith Resnik"", ""index"": 0, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": true}, {""id"": ""wmqsk"", ""name"": ""Hajyahia, Alaa"", ""index"": 1, ""orcid"": null, ""bibliographic"": false}, {""id"": ""jg5c2"", ""name"": ""Nor Ortiz"", ""index"": 2, ""orcid"": ""0000-0002-6928-3358"", ""bibliographic"": false}]",Judith Resnik,Law; Civil Procedure,"[{""id"": ""65047462c666880012ba225a"", ""text"": ""Law""}, {""id"": ""6504746ac666880012ba23e0"", ""text"": ""Civil Procedure""}]",https://osf.io/download/67ba08ed1ccc909a8b19f79c,0,,,,null,,2025-04-09T21:06:23.547218