home / preprints / preprints_ui

preprints_ui: bheqw_v1

Denormalized preprint data with contributors and subjects for efficient UI access

Data license: ODbL (database) & original licenses (content) · Data source: Open Science Framework

This data as json, copyable

id title description date_created date_modified date_published original_publication_date publication_doi provider is_published reviews_state version is_latest_version preprint_doi license tags_list tags_data contributors_list contributors_data first_author subjects_list subjects_data download_url has_coi conflict_of_interest_statement has_data_links has_prereg_links prereg_links prereg_link_info last_updated
bheqw_v1 Generative AI Large Language Models and Researching the Law Generative AI Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly influencing the legal research landscape, challenging the traditional cognitive authority within the profession. This article explores how these models, despite their potential to simplify the vast amount of legal information, may also introduce risks of misinformation due to AI "hallucinations" and the advantages and limitations of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. By examining various legal research problems, the article highlights both the capabilities and shortcomings of generative AI in legal contexts. It emphasizes the need for vigilance, critical thinking, and a continued reliance on traditional research methods to mitigate the risks associated with over-reliance on AI-generated content. As the legal profession confronts an overwhelming influx of information, the role of AI in legal research will likely grow, making it crucial to balance cognitive ease with accuracy and reliability. 2024-08-16T13:49:15.031953 2024-10-04T13:17:37.673867 2024-08-16T13:54:27.709960 2024-08-12T05:00:00   lawarxiv 1 accepted 1 1 https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/bheqw No license AI Hallucinations; Artificial Intelligence in Law; Cognitive Authority; Cognitive Ease; Generative AI; Large Language Models; Legal Ethics; Legal Information; Legal Research; Retrieval-Augmented Generation ["AI Hallucinations", "Artificial Intelligence in Law", "Cognitive Authority", "Cognitive Ease", "Generative AI", "Large Language Models", "Legal Ethics", "Legal Information", "Legal Research", "Retrieval-Augmented Generation"] Paul Douglas Callister [{"id": "tv7cx", "name": "Paul Douglas Callister", "index": 0, "orcid": "0000-0002-9613-0138", "bibliographic": true}] Paul Douglas Callister Law; Science and Technology Law; Legal Writing and Research [{"id": "59bacc7e54be810341615c32", "text": "Law"}, {"id": "59bacc8954be810341615e19", "text": "Science and Technology Law"}, {"id": "59bacc8a54be810341615e5f", "text": "Legal Writing and Research"}] https://osf.io/download/66bf58f044d939e49cc5cdda 0   not_applicable not_applicable []   2025-04-09T21:06:12.605603
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 26.159ms · Data license: ODbL (database) & original licenses (content) · Data source: Open Science Framework