preprints_ui: gx9jq_v1

Denormalized preprint data with contributors and subjects for efficient UI access

Data license: ODbL (database) & original licenses (content) · Data source: Open Science Framework

id	title	description	date_created	date_modified	date_published	original_publication_date	publication_doi	provider	is_published	reviews_state	version	is_latest_version	preprint_doi	license	tags_list	tags_data	contributors_list	contributors_data	first_author	subjects_list	subjects_data	download_url	has_coi	conflict_of_interest_statement	has_data_links	has_prereg_links	prereg_links	prereg_link_info	last_updated
gx9jq_v1	How to get there from here? Barriers and enablers on the road towards reproducibility in research	Reproducibility of research is a hotly debated topic, including aspects like causes and consequences of low levels of reproducibility. While some research fields have led the way and introduced various reproducibility practices and procedures, the call for efforts to ‘improve’ reproducibility in research has not come without criticisms. The current study uses a future studies methodology to gather perceptions of developments in the research ecosystem related to reproducibility issues. It draws on input from representatives of four main stakeholder categories: scholarly publishers, funding agencies, qualitative social scientists and machine learning researchers. Particularly, it discusses the enablers and barriers that members of these stakeholder communities foresee on the road towards a research ecosystem that is more conducive to reproducibility. The study finds that enablers and barriers can be categorised into five main clusters. The factors most prominently mentioned as potentially supporting or hindering a desired future are located within research culture, including norms, values and shared definitions; and in the infrastructure required to engage in reproducibility practices, including repositories, support staff, and digital infrastructure. Three other clusters of factors put forth by participants relate to policy efforts required to incentivise reproducibility practices; training and education to empower researchers and support staff to engage in reproducibility practices; and the financial resources required to facilitate the transition towards a desired future and to specifically fund replication studies. This manuscript also identifies several tensions between enablers and barriers perceived by diverse stakeholders and concludes with recommendations for addressing these.	2025-03-06T12:09:49.058849	2025-03-25T07:40:27.927169	2025-03-10T20:23:55.114892			metaarxiv	1	accepted	1	0	https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/gx9jq_v1	CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International	TIER2; future studies; open science; reproduciblity	["TIER2", "future studies", "open science", "reproduciblity"]	Serge P.J.M. Horbach; Nicki Lisa Cole; Simone Kopeinik; Barbara Leitner; Tony Ross-Hellauer; Joeri Tijdink	[{"id": "dgu5r", "name": "Serge P.J.M. Horbach", "index": 0, "orcid": "0000-0003-0406-6261", "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "7394h", "name": "Nicki Lisa Cole", "index": 1, "orcid": "0000-0002-6034-533X", "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "2umsf", "name": "Simone Kopeinik", "index": 2, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "8t4s7", "name": "Barbara Leitner", "index": 3, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "zuxft", "name": "Tony Ross-Hellauer", "index": 4, "orcid": "0000-0003-4470-7027", "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "na86r", "name": "Joeri Tijdink", "index": 5, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}]	Serge P.J.M. Horbach	Social and Behavioral Sciences; Other Social and Behavioral Sciences	[{"id": "5c81de83e48c52001647c154", "text": "Social and Behavioral Sciences"}, {"id": "5c81de83e48c52001647c155", "text": "Other Social and Behavioral Sciences"}]	https://osf.io/download/67c990a92b025affb3fd70f8	0		no	available	["https://osf.io/87z29"]	prereg_both	2025-04-09T21:06:14.895588