home / preprints / preprints_ui

preprints_ui: jy2e7_v1

Denormalized preprint data with contributors and subjects for efficient UI access

Data license: ODbL (database) & original licenses (content) · Data source: Open Science Framework

This data as json, copyable

id title description date_created date_modified date_published original_publication_date publication_doi provider is_published reviews_state version is_latest_version preprint_doi license tags_list tags_data contributors_list contributors_data first_author subjects_list subjects_data download_url has_coi conflict_of_interest_statement has_data_links has_prereg_links prereg_links prereg_link_info last_updated
jy2e7_v1 Ultrasound Triggered Gelation to Treat Discogenic Lower Back Pain Motivation: Lower back pain (LBP) is one of the leading causes of global disability. LBP and related radicular leg pain are closely linked to intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration, which accounts for approximately 40% of the estimated 619 million LBP cases worldwide. Currently, there are two diametrically opposed treatment options for this condition: conservative physiotherapy to provide temporary relief, or major surgical intervention. Neither has proven to provide suitable long-term outcomes. Emerging strategies focus on injectable biomaterials to provide structural support and facilitate tissue repair, although they are still largely experimental and face several limitations, including limited integration with native tissue. Moreover, the implant formation mechanism may be depth-limited (light curing) or time-constrained (self-curing). Aim: The objective of this research is to demonstrate a new option to restore spinal function through the use of extracorporeal ultrasound to remotely trigger in situ implant formation on demand, such that the clinician can control the process with the timing and location of their choosing. The system concept centers around an implant precursor material consisting of an anionic polysaccharide matrix seeded with thermally sensitive liposomes. Ultrasound-mediated heating on the order of 3-5 degrees above normal body temperature triggers the release of crosslinking species from the liposomes, thereby initiating hydrogel formation. Methods: Candidate polysaccharide and liposome formulations were evaluated for their injectability, loading efficiency, and post-gelation mechanical properties. Ultrasound parameters (frequency, pressure, duty cycle) were optimized for targeted heating efficiency. Techniques for treatment process monitoring and control were independently investigated using thermometry and acoustic cavitation emissions. The material constructs and ultrasound protocols were used together in a series of proof-of-concept experiments using ex vivo bovine IVD specimens, with biomechanical analysis across three states: intact, degenerated, and after ultrasound-triggered implant formation. Results: Extensive testing revealed an optimized implant precursor material consisting of sodium alginate (1.5 wt/v%) seeded with calcium-loaded liposomes (157±9 nm) to enable hyperthermia-triggered release and glass microspheres (6 wt/v%) to ensure preferential ultrasound absorption for safe heating. No significant difference was found between hydrogels heated with an incubator or ultrasound, suggesting comparable calcium release between both methods. Optimal ultrasound parameters for precursor gel heating were found to be 0.95 MHz, 1.6 MPa (peak negative), and 87% duty cycle. Automated treatment control using temperature or cavitation emission measurements both were successfully implemented, with cavitation being preferable for non-invasive implementation. Proof of concept experiments indicated partial restoration of biomechanical function in ex vivo bovine IVDs, with implant material well-integrated into the disc tissue, and without material herniation. Conclusion: We have demonstrated the feasibility of ultrasound-guided hydrogel gelation in situ. These results offer promise for treating spinal disc degeneration, with continued refinement of materials and protocols essential for achieving robust in-disc efficacy. 2024-12-14T10:09:56.635128 2024-12-14T12:02:43.042689 2024-12-14T12:02:22.683465     focusarchive 1 accepted 1 1 https://doi.org/10.31225/osf.io/jy2e7 CC-By Attribution 4.0 International   [] Veerle Brans; Anna Constantinou; Luca Bau; Constantin Coussios; Molly Stevens; Michael Gray; Matthew Kibble; Nicolas Newell [{"id": "bm2a4", "name": "Veerle Brans", "index": 0, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "x6g3m", "name": "Anna Constantinou", "index": 1, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "v3amz", "name": "Luca Bau", "index": 2, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "grf4k", "name": "Constantin Coussios", "index": 3, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "5wmzx", "name": "Molly Stevens", "index": 4, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "f7mgc", "name": "Michael Gray", "index": 5, "orcid": "0000-0002-3245-3296", "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "wgczh", "name": "Matthew Kibble", "index": 6, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "sc4qe", "name": "Nicolas Newell", "index": 7, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}] Veerle Brans Engineering; Materials Science and Engineering; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering [{"id": "59bacc5654be81033c4e4a6f", "text": "Engineering"}, {"id": "59bacc5854be81033c4e4ad7", "text": "Materials Science and Engineering"}, {"id": "59bacc5a54be81033c4e4b3c", "text": "Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering"}] https://osf.io/download/675d59966cb843fc3ef7c15c 0   no not_applicable []   2025-04-09T21:06:15.356151
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 5.686ms · Data license: ODbL (database) & original licenses (content) · Data source: Open Science Framework