home / preprints / preprints_ui

preprints_ui: nwcp6_v1

Denormalized preprint data with contributors and subjects for efficient UI access

Data license: ODbL (database) & original licenses (content) · Data source: Open Science Framework

This data as json, copyable

id title description date_created date_modified date_published original_publication_date publication_doi provider is_published reviews_state version is_latest_version preprint_doi license tags_list tags_data contributors_list contributors_data first_author subjects_list subjects_data download_url has_coi conflict_of_interest_statement has_data_links has_prereg_links prereg_links prereg_link_info last_updated
nwcp6_v1 Pelvic Congestion Syndrome (PCS) and Pelvic Venous Disorders (PeVD) are not well represented in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Journals. Background: Pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) or more latterly pelvic venous disorders (PeVD) is usually defined as a female health problem. However, it is our impression that gynaecologists rarely recognise this condition, and most of the research interest appears to be by vascular and venous surgeons, and radiologists. The aim of this study was to investigate if there was evidence to support this view. Methods: An online search of the PubMed® database was performed using the search terms “pelvic congestion”, “PCS”, “pelvic venous disorders” and “PeVD”, filtered for relevance to “pelvic veins”. Articles were collected from 2013 – 2024 and analysed for which type of journal they appeared in (obstetrics and/or gynaecology, radiology, vascular, venous, angiology, other) and what sort of article each was (original article, review, case report). Results: We found 281 articles published for PCS and 38 articles for PeVD, a total of 319 overall. There was a general increase in articles over the time course. However, 33.2% appeared in vascular and venous journals, 20.4% in radiology journals and only 11.3% in obstetric and/or gynaecology journals. There was no indication that the percentage of articles on PCS/PeVD was increasing in the female health journals over the time studied. Conclusion: PCS/PeVD is underrepresented in obstetrics and/or gynaecology journals. Most articles appear in vascular and venous journals. This gives rise to concern that women suffering from pelvic pain due to PCS/PeVD tend to consult gynaecologists, rather than vascular and venous specialists who are more actively involved in researching the condition. 2024-09-18T14:04:48.126715 2025-01-11T05:42:13.188969 2024-09-18T14:29:19.017847 2025-01-09T00:00:00 https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251314285 coppreprints 1 accepted 1 1 https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/nwcp6 CC0 1.0 Universal CPP; Chronic Pelvic Pain; Obstetrics and Gynaecology; PCS; PeVD; Pelvic Venous Disorders; Pelvic congestion syndrome ["CPP", "Chronic Pelvic Pain", "Obstetrics and Gynaecology", "PCS", "PeVD", "Pelvic Venous Disorders", "Pelvic congestion syndrome"] Mark Steven Whiteley; Hannah A Imran [{"id": "bp75e", "name": "Mark Steven Whiteley", "index": 0, "orcid": "0000-0001-6727-6245", "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "cx39r", "name": "Hannah A Imran", "index": 1, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}] Mark Steven Whiteley Pelvic Congestion Syndrome [{"id": "633b0ebf850fea000a2aabbc", "text": "Pelvic Congestion Syndrome"}] https://osf.io/download/66eade773c1fe4d02ffeeb66 0   not_applicable not_applicable []   2025-04-09T21:06:17.703753
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 10.238ms · Data license: ODbL (database) & original licenses (content) · Data source: Open Science Framework