home / preprints / preprints_ui

preprints_ui: vf34q_v1

Denormalized preprint data with contributors and subjects for efficient UI access

Data license: ODbL (database) & original licenses (content) · Data source: Open Science Framework

This data as json, copyable

id title description date_created date_modified date_published original_publication_date publication_doi provider is_published reviews_state version is_latest_version preprint_doi license tags_list tags_data contributors_list contributors_data first_author subjects_list subjects_data download_url has_coi conflict_of_interest_statement has_data_links has_prereg_links prereg_links prereg_link_info last_updated
vf34q_v1 Total energy output from a diode endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) console does not vary depending on continuous or pulsed use – observed variations in power output may be due to sensor and power meter inertia. Background: Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in truncal veins uses a constant power and smooth pull-back. In short veins (ie: incompetent perforator veins or neovascular tissue) power can be pulsed, allowing tissue cooling between pulses and reduction of thermal spread, protecting surrounding tissues. Power meter measurements suggest it takes over 2 seconds for a diode laser to reach 90% of maximum power output. Hence pulses shorter than 2 seconds might result in less energy being deposited into target tissues than indicated on the console. The aim of this study is to compare the power emitted from the tip of the laser device during continuous or pulsed use to that displayed on the console. Methods: A 600 micron radial fibre connected to a 1470 nm EVLA diode console was fired at 10 W onto a sensor connected to a power meter, until 100 J had been emitted, for each of the following: continuous; pulsed 1 sec on, 1 sec off; pulsed 0.5 sec on, 1 sec off. Each was repeated 5 times, and the power recorded every 0.1 sec. Results: The power meter recorded reduced peak powers in the pulsed experiments as expected, due to delay in reaching maximum output. However, all three protocols resulted in 94% of the total energy being emitted from the tip of the EVLA device. Analysis of the power data suggested that there was a delay in the power being recorded by the sensor and power meter both when activating and deactivating the laser. Conclusion: Pulsing the laser power did not affect the total energy emitted from the tip of the EVLA device. The delay in reaching maximum power recorded by the power meter appears to be due to a sensor delay responding to incident laser energy, rather than the output from the laser diode and console. 2024-10-02T07:33:08.529789 2024-10-02T07:52:40.624870 2024-10-02T07:52:15.840017     coppreprints 1 accepted 1 1 https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/vf34q CC0 1.0 Universal EVLA; LEED; endovenous; energy; laser; measurements; power; power meter ["EVLA", "LEED", "endovenous", "energy", "laser", "measurements", "power", "power meter"] Oscar F Berhanu; Mark Steven Whiteley [{"id": "ek4au", "name": "Oscar F Berhanu", "index": 0, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "bp75e", "name": "Mark Steven Whiteley", "index": 1, "orcid": "0000-0001-6727-6245", "bibliographic": true}] Oscar F Berhanu Surgery / Endovenous; General Subjects and Opinions [{"id": "633b0ebf850fea000a2aabbf", "text": "Surgery / Endovenous"}, {"id": "644ac7030a7f380cbbae49e8", "text": "General Subjects and Opinions"}] https://osf.io/download/66fcf7468cd0cff22da20359 0   no not_applicable []   2025-04-09T21:06:13.113748
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1.625ms · Data license: ODbL (database) & original licenses (content) · Data source: Open Science Framework