preprints_ui: w4d8y_v1
Data license: ODbL (database) & original licenses (content) · Data source: Open Science Framework
| id | title | description | date_created | date_modified | date_published | original_publication_date | publication_doi | provider | is_published | reviews_state | version | is_latest_version | preprint_doi | license | tags_list | tags_data | contributors_list | contributors_data | first_author | subjects_list | subjects_data | download_url | has_coi | conflict_of_interest_statement | has_data_links | has_prereg_links | prereg_links | prereg_link_info | last_updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w4d8y_v1 | Framing Information Transfer Management (ITM): A Four-Zone Framework for Governing Knowledge in the Age of AI | We propose a four-zone framework for understanding Information Transfer Management (ITM) in the age of advanced artificial intelligence. Drawing on the evolution of platforms like Freenet, Wikipedia, and ChatGPT, and contrasting distinct regulatory logics, the framework identifies four attractor forces—Sovereignty, Market, Morality, and Method—that shape geopolitical ITM zones. This approach is designed to support idiomatic diplomacy: forms of communication that remain tolerable even between fundamentally incompatible regimes. Such communicative capacity is essential for any jurisdiction that seeks to regulate AI services. We demonstrate the framework’s analytic utility by profiling eight thinkers—Confucius, Mao Zedong, Smith, Friedman, Montesquieu, Bourdieu, Popper, and Goodfellow—across the four zones. This leads us to propose an epistemic shift within the "Method" zone itself, one that relates scientific authority to the forces of power, capital, and conviction. We conclude by arguing that our framework is both empirically tractable and theoretically expandable, and offer several research questions concerning generative social phenomena that we hope others will develop further. | 2025-05-10T10:36:35.537911 | 2025-05-10T15:09:22.278763 | 2025-05-10T15:09:11.086149 | socarxiv | 1 | accepted | 1 | 1 | https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/w4d8y_v1 | CC-By Attribution 4.0 International | AI governance; This preprint is under review at Nature Human Behaviour (submitted May 2025); epistemic pluralism; information transfer governance | ["AI governance", "This preprint is under review at Nature Human Behaviour (submitted May 2025)", "epistemic pluralism", "information transfer governance"] | aernout schmidt; Zhang Kunbei | [{"id": "7fc4t", "name": "aernout schmidt", "index": 0, "orcid": "0000-0003-2594-5767", "bibliographic": true}, {"id": "389qd", "name": "Zhang Kunbei", "index": 1, "orcid": null, "bibliographic": true}] | aernout schmidt | Law; Science and Technology Law; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration; Economic Policy; Social Policy; Infrastructure; Public Policy; Science and Technology Policy; Communication; International and Intercultural Communication | [{"id": "5a8c80f0c698300375c76c07", "text": "Law"}, {"id": "5a8c80f0c698300375c76c15", "text": "Science and Technology Law"}, {"id": "5a8c80f7c698300375c76d84", "text": "Social and Behavioral Sciences"}, {"id": "5a8c80f8c698300375c76ddb", "text": "Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration"}, {"id": "5a8c80f8c698300375c76ddf", "text": "Economic Policy"}, {"id": "5a8c80f9c698300375c76de0", "text": "Social Policy"}, {"id": "5a8c80f9c698300375c76de7", "text": "Infrastructure"}, {"id": "5a8c80f9c698300375c76deb", "text": "Public Policy"}, {"id": "5a8c80f9c698300375c76ded", "text": "Science and Technology Policy"}, {"id": "5a8c80f9c698300375c76e0d", "text": "Communication"}, {"id": "5a8c80f9c698300375c76e17", "text": "International and Intercultural Communication"}] | https://osf.io/download/681f2c60089303dfefeadffa | 0 | not_applicable | not_applicable | [] | 2025-05-11T00:11:37.463125 |